by New York Fights Harmful Emissions with the Help of Residents
New York has introduced an unusual way to combat vehicle emissions: the city is engaging its residents in monitoring violations. Every day, about 700,000 cars are on the streets of the metropolis, and to control their idling with the engine running, the authorities have allowed citizens to record such cases and receive a portion of the fine. One activist claims to earn over $100,000 a year from this.
How the Fine System Works
If a vehicle idles with its engine running for more than three minutes, any citizen can submit evidence and receive 25% of the fine amount. The average fine ranges from $350 to $600. One of the most active participants in the program, who goes by the name “Streeter,” said he spends 6 to 9 hours a day looking for violators on his bicycle.
“After 6 a.m., I’m already on the road, looking for trucks that are just standing with their engines running,” Streeter shared.
It is important to note that the law applies only to non-city buses and trucks. A fine is imposed only after idling is recorded for a duration of three minutes or more. If the vehicle is in the process of loading or unloading, there will be no fine.
Risks and Drivers’ Reactions
However, this system also has its drawbacks. Some activists face aggression from drivers. As program participants recount, they have been pursued and even physically attacked. Representatives of the transportation industry, in turn, consider this system unfair.
“Drivers feel like they are being hunted as prey,” stated lobbyist Zack Miller.
This initiative has been in place for several years, and despite the controversies, it continues to attract attention. Whether it is an effective way to improve the environment or an excessive control measure remains an open question.
The system certainly causes public resonance, especially among those who suffer from air pollution. Some activists started doing this due to personal experience related to health problems caused by poor air quality. Others point out that the wasteful consumption of fuel is also a matter of economics and safety.
