The idea of a car that autonomously navigates the city while its owner relaxes at home has existed for many years, always seeming just on the verge of becoming reality, yet it remains unrealized. Now, as the company continues to promise that this technology is imminent, the US Patent Office may introduce new delays.
It turns out that names like “Robotaxi” and “Cybercab” might be too generic for trademark registration, which could complicate Tesla’s plans for their implementation.
It’s worth noting that in Tesla’s concept, these terms denote different things. The first refers to the two-door prototype presented a year ago. The second refers to the software that will allow Tesla owners to use their cars for passenger transportation without their involvement.
According to reports, the US patent office rejected the application for the “Robotaxi” trademark. In its decision, they noted that this name “describes the function, purpose, or audience of the company’s goods and services.” In other words, it is not unique enough. To confirm this, the bureau even quoted Wikipedia, Zoox, and The Verge.
“This term is used by other companies to describe similar goods and services,” states the document. A similar decision was made in April regarding the “Cybercab” application.
The FSD-supervised ride-hailing service is already available to a limited number of employees in Austin and San Francisco.
We have completed over 1.5 thousand trips and 15 thousand miles.
This system helps us improve technologies, the mobile app, vehicle distribution, and control…
— Tesla AI (@Tesla_AI)
In the case of “Cybercab,” the patent office pointed out several issues, including potential consumer confusion. They also mentioned other companies that use the word “Cyber,” particularly those specializing in Cybertruck tuning. In a way, Tesla itself created this situation. However, the names have not been finally rejected yet.
In both cases, Tesla can submit additional evidence to support its applications. Undoubtedly, these names are increasingly associated with this particular company. A response must be provided within three months, otherwise the applications will be rejected. This deadline extends beyond the planned launch in June, so expect news on this topic soon.