The idea of a car that autonomously navigates the city while its owner relaxes at home has existed for many years, always seeming just about to become reality, but has yet to be realized. Now, as the company continues to promise that this technology is on its way, the U.S. Patent Office may introduce new delays.
It turns out that names like “Robotaxi” and “Cybercab” may be too generic for trademark registration, which could complicate Tesla’s plans for their implementation.
It is worth noting that in Tesla’s concept, these terms denote different things. The first refers to a two-door prototype presented a year ago. The second refers to the software that will allow Tesla owners to use their cars to transport passengers without their involvement.
According to reports, the U.S. patent office rejected the application for the “Robotaxi” trademark. In their decision, they noted that this name “describes the function, purpose, or audience of the company’s goods and services.” In other words, it is not unique enough. To confirm this, the bureau even quoted Wikipedia, Zoox, and The Verge.
“This term is used by other companies to describe similar goods and services,” the document states. A similar decision was made in April regarding the “Cybercab” application.
The FSD-supervised ride-hailing service is already available to a limited number of employees in Austin and San Francisco.
We have completed over 1.5 thousand trips and 15 thousand miles.
This system helps us improve technologies, the mobile app, vehicle distribution, and control…
— Tesla AI (@Tesla_AI)
In the case of “Cybercab,” the patent office pointed out several issues, including potential consumer confusion. They also mentioned other companies that use the word “Cyber,” particularly those specializing in tuning for the Cybertruck. In a way, Tesla itself created this situation. However, the names have not been finally rejected yet.
In both cases, Tesla can submit additional evidence to support its applications. Undoubtedly, these names are increasingly associated with this particular company. A response must be provided within three months, otherwise the applications will be rejected. This deadline extends beyond the planned launch in June, so expect news on this topic soon.