Tightening English Language Controls for Truck Drivers
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration is strengthening oversight of compliance with English language proficiency requirements among truck drivers across the country. This is happening against the backdrop of the Trump administration’s measures to combat illegal migration.
According to the administration, 9,873 violations related to non-compliance with English language knowledge requirements were recorded this year. This resulted in 3,020 out-of-service orders, meaning the immediate cessation of a driver’s or vehicle’s operation until the issue is resolved.
Sharp Increase in Violations
Compared to 2024, when 3,547 violations regarding English language requirements were registered, this year shows a significant increase. Back then, only one out-of-service order was issued. In 2023, there were even fewer violations—349, and no out-of-service orders. However, there are different categories of violations related to the English language, which complicates direct comparison.
Threats of Funding Cuts for States
Transportation Secretary Shawn Duffy is actively demanding that truck drivers be proficient in English. He recently threatened to cut federal funding for California, Washington, and New Mexico if they do not begin to adhere to and enforce English proficiency requirements for commercial drivers.
You must be able to speak English and understand road signs to operate a truck. Follow the rules set by @USDOT in your state, or there will be serious consequences.
The government stated that an investigation revealed serious deficiencies in the enforcement of these requirements in the mentioned states. Furthermore, the California Highway Patrol has publicly stated it does not intend to comply with this federal rule.
The substantial increase in violations indicates a systemic problem that could affect road safety. Language proficiency requirements not only regulate professional standards but are also directly related to drivers’ ability to adequately perceive information and respond to emergencies. This situation also demonstrates how federal agencies are using financial mechanisms to influence state transportation policies.